The Namesake: An Endearing Story of an Indian-American Family

Title: The Namesake

the namesake cover
Mariner books, 2004. 305 pages.

Author: Jhumpa Lahiri

Synopsis: An Indian-American family comes together and discovers their new sense of identity. They create a personal concept of family, and each shapes their lives in and around both Indian and American culture.  Though the story starts off focusing on the parents, it quickly shifts focus to the eldest son.

 

A note:  The Gangulis are culturally Bengali, but I will refer to them as Indian. Bangladesh gained independence from Pakistan in the early 1970s, which means Bangladesh became its own state during the lifetimes of these characters. However, the Gangulis are from Calcutta, meaning they are Indian by nationality. Because I’m writing this review in terms of nationality and citizenship (i.e. American and Indian), I refer to them as either Indian or Indian-American. Some reviews and websites refer to them as Bengali; I believe this is a matter of preference. I failed to find an official reference to the issue. Feel free to comment and let me know if you’ve seen something.

 

Book Trigger Warnings:  train crash and recovery described in detail, PTSD, parent loss, alcohol mentions

Rating: 5 glowing stars

First Impression upon Finishing:   That was so heartwarming!

 

The Review:  The Namesake is a powerful and beautifully written historical fiction novel. Lahiri’s narrative style is easy to read, yet generously (and delicately) decorated. Lahiri provides just the right amount of detail and manages to alter time in such a way that you neither feel rushed nor retarded, despite the obvious quickening and slowing of events in her characters’ lives. Lahiri gracefully switches focus between characters when the situation calls for it, though she mainly writes about Gogol (Nikhil) Ganguli. Gogol eventually changes his “public name” to Nikhil, but Lahiri continues to refer to him as Gogol in the narration, which lends to a sense of familiarity and camaraderie that draws us further into his story.

 

Near the beginning of The Namesake, we see how foreign American culture is to Ashima, and we see her attempts to bridge the gap by cooking (or trying to cook) food she grew up eating. Over time, we see both her and Ashoke (her husband) orienting themselves in American culture, holding fast to their own traditions but in some cases modifying and blending them with new, American habits.  All of this feels organic. Though the elder Gangulis’ integration is sometimes clumsy, it doesn’t come off as a heavy-handed attempt to illustrate immigrant struggles.

 

Gogol and Sonia (the Ganguli children), having been born in America,  are on a quest for assimilation rather than integration. As is often the case with first-generation Americans, Gogol and Sonia reject aspects of their parents’ culture. They speak English between each other and resent their trips “back home” to India. As children they long for french fries and hot dogs more than they crave their mother’s more traditional cooking. Of course, time has a way of changing things.

 

Some people—particularly those who are the first in their families to start a life in a new country—  will find familiarity in Ashoke and Ashima’s story. I, however, found Gogol’s story so relatable it literally hurt. Though my parents and I are all American, we belong to our own southern Black sub-culture. I’m nearly 40 years younger than my parents; I grew up in a very different American than they did. They still retain habits of the Old Days, for better or for worse. Like Gogol, hearing my parents speak anything other than our own vernacular English feels wrong, “off-key.” For Gogol and I, hearing our parents speak our “public names” send shivers down our spine, and it’s impossible not to detect the note of sadness, betrayal and disappointment in their voices whenever they utter them.

 

Having people from outside our cultures meet our parents is another matter entirely. It’s not because we are ashamed, it’s simply because there is usually too much explaining and translating involved. It becomes uncomfortable on our end. By the end of The Namesake, Gogol had progressed further than I have, but he is also about 7 years older than I am.

 

This review is not going in the direction I thought it would.

 

Here’s the thing:  despite the simplicity and straight-forwardness of the plot (Lahiri possesses excellent powers of foreshadowing), The Namesake is an incredibly complicated novel. I can’t recommend it enough because there’s something for everyone. Even if you don’t identify with the characters or the events in their lives, you get to enjoy a heartwarming coming of age story. You get to read an Own Voices novel that doesn’t have much of an agenda. As she has stated in many an interview, Lahiri writes largely as a means to work out some aspect of her own identity. She describes being “culturally displaced… [growing] up in two worlds simultaneously.” While putting this exploration on public display could be interpreted as political action, the politics don’t seem to be at the forefront of her mind.

 

I’d be lying if I said The Namesake will not play with your emotions, but at least it doesn’t leave the reader raw as some stories are wont to do. I felt the ending was a little abrupt, but that’s probably because I really wanted to see Gogol grow further. Nevertheless, the ending satisfied me, and I’m content with this brief but thorough glimpse into his life.

 

I’m not sure whether my review captured both the essence of the novel and my excitement for it, but I highly recommend The Namesake. There’s a movie as well, which I might check out. I loved The Namesake so much that I plan on eventually buying a personal copy so I can access it whenever I like. I’d like to see whether the impact of the novel will change as I myself grow and change.

 

If any of you have read the book, I’d love to hear your thoughts in the comments below. If there’s something I missed, let me know!

—–

Looking for more stories about people coming to America and trying to find their way? Check out my review of We Need New Names (5 stars) or How to Love a Jamaican (3 stars).

 

Find The Namesake on Amazon (Free with Kindle Unlimited)| Thriftbooks | Goodreads

Thriftbooks coupon (15% of first order): Click here and use within 2 weeks

 

 

I’ve Been Hit by a Freight Train

We Need New Names Cover
2013. Reagan Arthur Books. 298 pgs

We Need New Names

By: NoViolet Bulawayo

Like so many of the books I read, We Need New Names  is a library book I picked up while searching for something entirely different. Even though my school library removes the book jackets before shelving titles (it’s madness, I know), I catch myself reading the spines as I walk down the aisles. The spine of We Need New Names is nothing spectacular, but the title itself drew me in. I couldn’t tell what type of book it would be, but I found it housed in the “African Literature” section, which was enough to sell me.

When I got home, I opened the book and was immediately transfixed. Before I even knew the narrator’s name, I inferred that one of her friends had been sexually abused by someone, most probably a family member (not a spoiler, I promise). Her friend was 11 at the time. I knew I’d be in for a hard read. Darling, the narrator and protagonist, begins the book as a child living in Zimbabwe. Throughout the story we learn who destroyed her home and how she came to live in poverty, and it is through this impoverished, childlike point of view that Darling analyzes the world. Bulawayo uses unconventional word choice to reflect Darling’s age and level of education, and at times Bulawayo foregoes the standards of English grammar and punctuation to further the narrative and create more believable characters. Bulawayo’s ability to age Darling by modifying her vocabulary was incredibly impressive. For readers who haven’t been exposed to such an individualized writing style might find the narrative hard to follow. I personally found the writing style incredibly refreshing.

As a child, Darling is forced to attempt to comprehend subject matter that even adults sometimes struggle with. She’s exposed to abusive family relationships, famine, AIDS, death, politics, foreign “aid” and racism. Later, as a teenager, she finds herself trying to assimilate into a culture entirely different from her own. She learns to internalize racism, and eventually begins to judge her friends and family members based on what she’s learned. Darling learns the reality of an undocumented immigrant’s life in the United States.

At time, I empathized with Darling, though my life has been very different from hers. There were situations Darling dealt with that are simply the result of being Black in America, and I wonder how much of it came from Bulawayo’s own experience as a Zimbabwean expatriate in the U.S. What I find most interesting about the narrative, is that I detect a pride for Bulawayo’s native Zimbabwe. Yes, both she and her main character left the country, but in the novel, at least, the motive behind the move seems to be in interest of rebuilding Zimbabwe. Darling and the  few family members she has in the U.S. left Zimbabwe to find work and send money back home. Though Darling narrates the stress and the burden this obligation puts on her and her family, it seems like there’s almost a sense of duty to help her African brethren.

 With fantastic word choice, an enticing plot, and enough intrigue to keep me reading while staying over at a friend’s house (sorry Baaria!), We Need New Names deserves a gleaming 5 stars.

Ta-Nehisi Coates’ “Between the World and Me”

Between the World and Me is an in-depth look at the black American male experience…In three sentences, Coates simultaneously denounces the idea of race and defines racism, shattering our preconceptions of both.

Between the World and Me
2015. Spiegel & Grau- an offshoot of Random House Publishers. 152 pgs

Between the World and Me
By: Ta-Nahesis Coates
3.5 stars best

Coates uses unremarkable vocabulary and old ideas, but Between the World and Me is certainly worth the read. It’s an in-depth look at the black American male experience. I appreciate that Coates does not attempt to push his story as the “one story,” the singular narrative of people of his demographic. In fact, Coates goes to great lengths to give examples of stories that are unlike his own, which enhances his overall argument.  The novel is written in the form of an anecdote-filled letter to his son, and the ideas are woven together beautifully. Each section introduces a subject that is clearly different from but also clearly related to the previous one.

The book is separated into three parts. The first part sets up the theme of the novel and details Coates’ youth. Here, Coates establishes the fundamental premise of the book: “Race is the child of racism, not the father”(p7). Before making such a bold claim he writes,

“Americans believe in the reality of ‘race’ as a defined, indubitable feature of the natural world. Racism— the need to ascribe bone-deep features to people and then humiliate, reduce, and destroy them— inevitably follows from this inalterable condition” (p7).

In three sentences, Coates has simultaneously denounced the idea of race and  defined racism, shattering our preconceptions of both. Because Coates believes race is a societally enforced categorization, he refers to caucasians as “Americans who believe they are white” (p6). After  settling the definitions of race and racism, Coates attacks “the Dream.” He describes it as smelling like peppermint and tasting like strawberry shortcake (p11). That is to say, Americans are chasing what they believe to be the Dream, but because the Dream is not what it seems to be, it is unattainable, especially for the disadvantaged demographics who are forced to be content with just smelling the Dream because it “rests on [their] backs” (p11).

Much of part one is dedicated to illustrating the effects the interactions between race, racism, and the Dream have on a growing black man. He infuses the section with the fear his elders had for his safety, which he only came to understand as he grew older. Coates wants his son to understand that “police departments [in his] country have been endowed with the authority to destroy [his] body” (p9). In part one, Coates also acknowledges the difference between street rules and school rules. As a child he attempted to live by both codes of conduct, but at times the two worlds were irreconcilably different. Despite the differences between the two, school and the streets served the same purpose: to imprison. Coates laments his situation, echoing the cries of today’s youth:

“If the streets shackled my right leg, the schools shackled my left. Fail to comprehend the streets and you gave up your body now. But fail to comprehend the schools and you gave up your body later. I suffered at the hands of both, but I resent the schools more” (p25).

It is difficult to focus on school when your life may be taken at any point between home and the educational facility. By going to school, however, he was tacitly agreeing to play by higher society’s rules, and hoping to receive its protections in return. Still, because higher society tends to turn its back on the streets, there was no guarantee of safety in the schools. Had Coates been killed on the streets, there might have been an uproarious outcry by the public, demanding justice for the dutiful community citizen, but it would have been temporary at best, and those who continued to protest would quickly be silenced by the community’s order enforcers. In the 1980s, a black man’s life was less than important.

Part two of Between the World and Me covers Coates’ post-college, early adult life. The fear introduced in the first section does not dissipate. In fact, the fear intensifies as it switches from hindsight to foresight. Fear has begun to color his world in such a way that it alters his behaviors; he behaves more carefully. The section begins with a description of a traffic stop in a county known for its high number of police shootings by police. Coates was well aware that though traffic stops are usually harmless, there was a high possibility he wouldn’t make it out of that particular situation alive. His fear quickly became rage and bewilderment when he learned the fate of one of his peers. The peer’s name has been omitted in this review so as to avoid spoiling the novel, but this particular peer had “made it though,” he had gone to college and graduated but still lost his life (p77).  In an instant, the flaws in the protections afforded black men who go to school were exposed. The game that was previously thought to give educated black men an advantage  quickly turned into a game of Russian roulette.

Perhaps the most poignant passage in Coates’ novel is the comparison between police violence the 9/11 terrorism on page 87:

“But I [knew] that Bin Laden was not the first to bring terror to that section of the city…I could see no difference between the officer who killed [my former classmate] and the police who died, or the firefighters or died. They were not human to me…They were the menaces of nature.”

Though it’s extreme, the near flippancy with which Coates handles 9-11 breathes live into his argument. The “overwrought slogans” mirror the current #blacklivesmatter movement, and Coates’ treatment of 9/11 exaggerates the dire situation of black americans. Coates, however, made an egregious misstep in depriving the police and firefighters of their humanity. In calling them inhuman, he is giving them the same treatment they give black people,  but perhaps that’s his intention.

Later in part two, Coates elaborates upon the “American tradition,” which he insists is to “destroy the black body” (p103). Not unlike today’s black rights activists, he sites the slave trade as the foundation for the current systematic destruction of black Americans. Coates continues this narrative, using an anecdote to illustrate that black Americans don’t even enjoy the privilege of  defending their beliefs.

Part three is by far the shortest section– it’s less than 20 pages long– and is most preoccupied with the story of Coates’ fallen classmate. More precisely, Coates’ approached his classmate’s mother, and asked for her perspective on the recent events. Her powerful testimony adds the human dimension that is so often forgotten in cries for justice. As a society, we focus on the boys and forget the family. We focus on the government and forget the boys. In fact, both Coates and his classmate’s mother acknowledge that “the forgetting is a habit” (143). After the initial wave of protests, the cases are forgotten until a verdict is reached. If the verdict is unfavorable, then and only then do the protests resume, for a brief period of time.

Between the World and Me was a good, quick read, though it’s hard to say it’s not a book that should be read over and over again without pause in between. Undoubtedly the novel has a lot to offer, and should be passed on to children who are old enough to understand it. It goes without saying a reader’s background will heavily influence their reaction to the Between the World and Me, but perhaps  everyone could benefit from reading it at decade-long intervals to see how the the world and their interactions therein have changed (if at all).

 

 

 

 

Design a site like this with WordPress.com
Get started